The warehouse costs hiding in plain sight

Features

The warehouse costs hiding in plain sight
 
Published Friday, October 9, 2026 11:00 am
by Retail Dive

This is a summary

"Most warehouse costs don’t show up on any report. The visibility gap is why.

Every warehouse has a visibility gap. It is the difference between what the system says is on the floor and what is actually there and in most operations, it is wider than anyone realizes. It does not announce itself. It grows through ordinary daily activity: a put-away logged to the wrong location, a short shipment recorded as complete, a pallet moved without a system update. By the time the gap surfaces, the cost is already embedded in overtime, missed service level agreements and emergency expediting."

Read the original on Retail Dive

The warehouse costs hiding in plain sight | Retail Dive

Image credit to CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash


Send this page to a friend

The warehouse costs hiding in plain sight | Retail Dive

Recent News

The warehouse costs hiding in plain sight

Every warehouse has a visibility gap—the difference between what the system says is on the floor and what is actually there—and most operations have wider gaps than they realize, with costs that compound silently through normal-looking activity. The average warehouse spends 6,500 hours per year on manual cycle counts, the equivalent of three full-time employees counting continuously, year-round, yet by the time count data reaches decision-makers, it is already outdated. The underlying causes are consistent across operations: inventory shrinkage, phantom stock, and location drift, with six percent of total labor costs consumed by inventory the team knew existed but couldn't locate. These hidden costs include wasted labor searching for product, inefficient replenishment cycles driven by what's in the building rather than what's on shelves, and the compound effect of inventory management errors that are rarely captured on a single profit-and-loss report.

What the Super El Niño means for retail


The strongest El Niño weather disruption on record is destined to upset seasonal merchandising plans unless retailers prepare for it, with the phenomenon expected to peak between October and January 2026-2027. Brands that sell apparel for low temperatures or gear for winter sports face vulnerability to a potentially very warm winter, including retailers like Burlington, Deckers, Canada Goose, and VF Corp's The North Face and Timberland brands. Conversely, retailers selling warm-weather apparel and goods stand to benefit from extended warm-season purchasing windows that disrupt traditional fall and winter retail cycles. The largest retail implication may emerge through the food supply chain as El Niño adds a layer of volatility to already pressured commodities, with price impacts expected to reach retail shelves six to twelve months after the event peaks, likely in 2027. Over a quarter of consumers surveyed said that good weather leads them to spend more, and warm temperatures caused by El Niño will seem like good weather to many people.

Flock Backlash Isn't Slowing Real Estate's AI-Driven Surveillance Boom

Artificial intelligence-driven surveillance is rapidly expanding across the commercial real estate sector despite facing growing public scrutiny and privacy concerns, with property owners and managers increasingly deploying advanced camera systems and analytics to monitor tenant safety and secure buildings. These sophisticated tools can automatically detect suspicious behavior, unauthorized entry, and potential security threats in real time, significantly reducing the need for constant human monitoring by security personnel and lowering operating costs. Companies like Cloudastructure and Flock Safety are securing major contracts with real estate investment firms, with Cloudastructure recently landing its largest deal to provide exclusive surveillance solutions for a luxury high-rise property in Houston, including 24/7 remote guarding software, smart surveillance cameras, and integrated cloud platforms. Industry advocates argue these technologies are essential for modern risk management, though privacy concerns persist as biometric data collection and omnipresent video surveillance trigger regulatory scrutiny and civil liberties questions.